1. There were two planetary explosions within our solar system, and these two events form the basic framework around which to fasten any chronology distilled from the ancient texts relating the cosmic war;

a. The first of these was the explosion of a larger body, some 65,000,000 years ago, that accounts for the formation of the K/T boundary in the geological records, and coinciding with the demise of the dinosaurs and the rise of mammalian life;

(1) As was seen, Van Flandern was led to the adoption of two explosions on the basis of the lack of a planetary geological layer, such as the K/T boundary, occurring in rock strata ca. 3,200,000 years ago;

(2) As I suggested, however, the explosion ca. 3,200,000 years ago may have occurred when the Earth was at its farthest point from the exploding body, and hence any shock wave would have been considerably dissipated.

 

b. The second of these was the explosion of a smaller body ca. 3,200,000 years ago.

 

2. According to Van Flandern, these two explosions at 3,200,000 and 65,000,000 years ago were the explosions of a smaller “moon-sized” body and a larger Saturn-sized planet, respectively;

a. This planet Saturn-sized body was in all likelihood a solid and water-bearing planet. This planet may have been the planet referred to in the ancient Babylonian epic, the Enuma Elish, as Tiamat.

b. As a water-bearing planet, this body might have been a life-sustaining planet, and possibly home to intelligent human-like or humanoid life as well.

c. If it was home to intelligent life, it was speculated that this creature would have had much larger physiologies and skeletal structure compared to modern homo sapiens sapiens. In short, these creatures would have been giants. Given the interaction between the “gods” and mankind that so many Mesopotamian texts and traditions — including the biblical — attest to, and their resulting offspring in “giants,” one method of loosely corroborating the existence of such life on the now missing and exploded planet, and its interaction with the earth, would be the discovery of giant humanoid fossilized remains, or acceptable testimony to the same.

d. As was seen in chapter four, there does exist a whole set of data, both of written testimony, plus fossilized or mummified remains, that attests to the existence of much-larger-than normal humans or human-like creatures.

(1) As noted, many of these testimonies report peculiar features, such as sexedigitism and double dentition;

(2) Many of these ancient testimonies record the aggressive and cannibalistic tendencies of these creatures.

 

 

3. Plasma physicist Anthony Peratt argues that some ancient petroglyphs — some dating to over 20,000 years ago — demonstrate remarkable accuracy in the depiction of standard plasma instabilities, and reasons that ancients must have witnessed such instabilities on a massive celestial scale thousands of years ago.

a. In arguing this point of view, Peratt poses the problem of the existence of intelligent observers of such events.

b. Peratt and other plasma cosmologists maintain that under certain conditions any celestial system such as the solar system is not electrically neutral, and that enormous discharges can occur between differently polarized planetary bodies, causing enormous scarring and searing of the planets’ surfaces.

(1) In this respect, the Hygenius Rille on the Moon, and

(2) The channels on Jupiter’s moon Europa, and

(3) The Valles Marineris were all cited as typical large scale planetary features that display the same features of “plasma drilling” caused on surfaces in the laboratory.

(4) As was also demonstrated, the Martian scarring in particular may be planetary confirmation of the mythological motif of the scarred warrior, given Mars’ association within so many disparate mythologies with war, and given the planetary scarring referred to above.

 

 

4. It was suggested in chapter two that this plasma physics might itself be weaponized, and thereby account for the ancient myths of the divine weapon as a “lightning” bolt. In this respect, the similarity of ancient art works depicting these divine weapons with modern plasma instabilities was demonstrated.

a. An entirely different use of plasmas for communications - in the form of a galaxy-spanning grid of stars and pulsars - was proposed by Paul LaViolette. La Violette points to the anomalous behavior of pulsars and the lack of a good physics model to explain not only their behavior, but their non-random clustering in an exact geometry of one radian from the center of the galaxy as viewed from Earth. This non-randomness argues strongly that they may be the technological products of a highly advanced, galaxy-spanning civilization.

b. However, LaViolette also observes that there is a weapons application of this technology, related specifically to the scalar physics phenomena of beam splitting and mixing through an interferometric “grating” or template, and the use of a phase conjugate mirror. This implies that weapons drawing upon the very energy of entire stars or even star systems can be stimulated and accessed by the phenomenon of phase conjugation. This fact, coupled with the galaxy-wide “grid” of LaViolette’s “pulsar network” would imply that any warfare using such weapons would draw upon and affect that entire grid. It would be, in short, a truly cosmic war.

c. The link to scalar physics implies a deeper physics, one of longitudinal waves in the medium itself, as LaViolette himself suggested, citing the work of Lt. Col. Tom Bearden. Such waves could conceivably be used as propulsion, or also used to “surf” large scale celestial objects such as comets or asteroids on collision courses with planets, or used to explode a celestial body such as a planet or star by means of acoustic loading and cavitation to the point that such bodies lose core stability and explode. LaViolette himself proposes that some stars were deliberately exploded by his putative galactic civilization as components in his galactic grid.

 

5. Finally, the examination of catastrophism showed that it was in contradiction to the type of dense punning found in most ancient myths and motifs. Such symbols, it was argued, were best viewed not as symbols indicating one level of meaning, but several levels, each interlocking, but not identifiable with, the other, in a complex of associations. Among these associations, we discovered a formula

Mountains ≈ planets ≈ gods,

where “≈” means “is closely associated with but not identical to”, that will now become a crucial complex of symbols in Part Two.