
Historical Note
The tale of the hydroplane on Lake Windermere in
1911-1912 is a true one, although I have fictionalized certain
details—including the dragon. For the curious, here is the true
story of Beatrix Potter and the Water Bird.
The Water Bird, which some have called “Britain’s
first seaplane,” began its life in Manchester, England, where it
was built as a land plane. It was first flown in July 1911, and was
then moved to Lake Windermere, to a hangar on Cockshott Point,
where a float and airbags were substituted for the wheeled
undercarriage. It made its inaugural seaplane flight on November
25, 1911, and after that, made an astonishing 60 flights on 38
days, its longest 20 miles at an altitude of 800 feet. The plane’s
chief financial backer was a man named E. W. Wakefield from Kendal;
its pilot was Stanley Adams. Early in 1912, a second plane joined
the first, and Wakefield was said to have plans for five more, with
which he hoped to establish a passenger route between Bowness and
Grasmere.
There was a great deal of understandable
enthusiasm for the project among local shopkeepers, who felt that
aeroplanes would be good for business, and the press was regularly
invited to take photos and write stories. The promoters
energetically spread the word that the work they were doing had
scientific merit and that the aeroplane—and specifically, the
hydroplane—would prove useful if England went to war with the
Germans. There was a great deal of war-talk in the years before
fighting broke out, and the government was actively supporting
experiments in flight.
But the local folk and those who loved the scenic
beauty of the Lakes were not nearly as enthusiastic about the
project. The letter Beatrix Potter begins on page 13 of this novel,
expressing her unhappiness about the hydroplane, is an excerpt from
one she wrote to Millie Warne on December 13, 1911. Potter spoke
for the many who found the hydroplane not only a nuisance (what we
today call “noise pollution”) but a serious hazard to boating,
fishing, and transportation, and she found in this “a cause she
could not ignore, for both personal and environmental reasons,” as
Potter biographer Linda Lear puts it. In January 1912, Potter wrote
to Country Life magazine, protesting that “a more
inappropriate place for experimenting with flying machines could
scarcely be chosen,” citing the “danger to existing traffic—the
traffic of steamers, yachts, row-boats and Windermere Ferry.” She
was specific about the situation:
We are threatened with the prospect of an
aeroplane factory at Cockshott Point, between Bowness Bay and the
Ferry Nab, and with the completion of five more machines before
next summer. The existing machine flies up and down in the trough
of the hills; it turns at either end of the lake and comes back. It
flies at a comparatively low level; the nose of its propeller
resembles millions of blue-bottles, plus a steam threshing
machine.
The flying continued daily, although there was a
brief respite in February, when Potter wrote to Harold Warne that
“the hydrop. seems to be stopped with ice at present.”
Beatrix Potter wasn’t the only one writing
letters. That same month, Canon Rawnsley, a personal friend of the
Potters and one of the founders of the National Trust, wrote to
The Times, saying that “the value of the shores of
Windermere as a resort of rest and peace is seriously imperiled.”
The barrage of letters continued for some weeks, and Potter herself
launched a petition that garnered local and London signers. “I find
radicals much more willing [to sign] than conservatives,” she wrote
to Warne. The National Trust formed a committee “to preserve
Windermere from being used as an experimental ground for the
hydroplane” and lodged protests with the home secretary, who
brought Parliament into the act. On March 20, 1912, a meeting of
Members of Parliament and “interested parties” was held in the
House of Commons, where objections were raised to this rude
disturbance of the tranquility of the Lake District. At the end of
the meeting, it was decided to ask the home secretary to hold an
inquiry and regulate the air traffic under the new Aerial
Regulation Act 1911.
Shortly after that, however, the dragon took
matters into his own hands. Oh, no—I’m sorry. It wasn’t like that
at all. It appears to have been a simple windstorm that did the
damage. On April 4, 1912, Beatrix wrote to Harold Warne that she
was “very pleased to hear that the roof of the hydro hangar has
blown in, & smashed two machines.” One of the aeroplanes was
repaired, but the Water Bird was totally destroyed.
The British Admiralty must have been disappointed
in this outcome, for there was serious military interest in the
plane. It is not recorded that Winston Churchill ever visited the
Cockshott hangar, although he certainly might have. He was keenly
interested in flying and in fact took flying lessons himself in
1912-1913, stopping only when his instructor died in a plane crash
(as the fictional Oscar Wyatt dies in this book) and his wife,
Clementine, put her foot down, grounding him. As First Lord of the
Admiralty, Churchill created the Royal Flying Corps in May 1912. It
was his personal sense of urgency that got England into the air
during the First World War and eventually made the seaplane an
important weapon against enemy submarines.
In addition to inserting the dragon into the
aeroplane story, I have taken a few other liberties with real-world
facts, chiefly with the way Beatrix Potter tells her parents about
her engagement. According to Linda Lear, she made that announcement
some months later, in the summer of 1912, after which “there ensued
another long and bitter contest of wills, not unlike the violent
battle between badger and fox that she had described in Mr.
Tod.” If I were Miss Potter, I think I would have chosen to
tell them in a letter.
Susan Wittig Albert
Bertram, Texas, September 2010
Bertram, Texas, September 2010