Chinese Reactions: Another Approach to Deterrence
No student of
military affairs would have thought it conceivable that the
People’s Liberation Army, barely finished with the civil war and
largely equipped with captured Nationalist weapons, would take on a
modern army backed up by nuclear weapons. But Mao was not a
conventional military strategist. Mao’s actions in the Korean War
require an understanding of how he viewed what, in Western
strategy, would be called deterrence or even preemption and which,
in Chinese thinking, combines the long-range, strategic, and
psychological elements.
In the West, the Cold
War and the destructiveness of nuclear weapons have produced the
concept of deterrence: to pose risks of destruction to a potential
aggressor out of proportion to any possible gain. The efficacy of
the threat is measured by things that do not happen, that is, the
wars being avoided.
For Mao, the Western
concept of deterrence was too passive. He rejected a posture in
which China was obliged to wait for an attack. Wherever possible,
he strove for the initiative. On one level, this was similar to the
Western concept of preemption—anticipating an attack by launching
the first blow. But in the Western doctrine, preemption seeks
victory and a military advantage. Mao’s approach to preemption
differed in the extraordinary attention he paid to psychological
elements. His motivating force was less to inflict a decisive
military first blow than to change the psychological balance, not
so much to defeat the enemy as to alter his calculus of risks. As
we shall see in the later chapters, Chinese actions in the Taiwan
Strait Crises of 1954–58, the Indian border clash of 1962, the
conflict with the Soviets along the Ussuri River in 1969–71, and
the Sino-Vietnam War of 1979 all had the common feature of a sudden
blow followed quickly by a political phase. Having restored the
psychological equation, in Chinese eyes, genuine deterrence has
been achieved.37
When the Chinese view
of preemption encounters the Western concept of deterrence, a
vicious circle can result: acts conceived as defensive in China may
be treated as aggressive by the outside world; deterrent moves by
the West may be interpreted in China as encirclement. The United
States and China wrestled with this dilemma repeatedly during the
Cold War; to some extent they have not yet found a way to transcend
it.
Conventional wisdom
has ascribed the Chinese decision to enter the Korean War to the
American decision to cross the 38th parallel in early October 1950
and the advance of U.N. forces to the Yalu River, the
Chinese-Korean border. Another theory was innate Communist
aggressiveness on the model of the European dictators a decade
earlier. Recent scholarship demonstrates that neither theory was
correct. Mao and his colleagues had no strategic designs on Korea
in the sense of challenging its sovereignty; before the war they
were more concerned about balancing Russia there. Nor did they
expect to challenge the United States militarily. They entered the
war only after long deliberations and much hesitation as a kind of
preemptive move.
The triggering event
for planning was the initial dispatch of American troops to Korea
coupled with the neutralization of the Taiwan Strait. From that
moment, Mao ordered planning for Chinese entry into the Korean War
for the purpose, at a minimum, of preventing the collapse of North
Korea—and occasionally for the maximal revolutionary aim of
expelling American forces from the peninsula entirely.38 He assumed—well
before American or South Korean forces had moved north of the 38th
parallel—that, unless China intervened, North Korea would be
overwhelmed. Stopping the American advance to the Yalu was a
subsidiary element. It created, in Mao’s mind, an opportunity for a
surprise attack and a chance to mobilize public opinion; it was not
the principal motivating factor. Once the United States repelled
the initial North Korean advance in August 1950, Chinese
intervention became highly probable; when it turned the tide of
battle by outflanking the North Korean army at Inchon and then
crossed the 38th parallel, it grew inevitable.
China’s strategy
generally exhibits three characteristics: meticulous analysis of
long-term trends, careful study of tactical options, and detached
exploration of operational decisions. Zhou Enlai started that
process by chairing conferences of Chinese leaders on July 7 and
July 10—two weeks after the American deployment in Korea—to analyze
the impact on China of American actions. The participants agreed to
redeploy troops originally intended for the invasion of Taiwan to
the Korean border and to constitute them as the Northeast Border
Defense Army with the mission “to defend the borders of the
Northeast, and to prepare to support the war operations of the
Korean People’s Army if necessary.” By the end of July—or more than
two months before U.S. forces crossed the 38th parallel—over
250,000 Chinese troops had been assembled on the Korean
border.39
The Politburo and
Central Military Commission meetings continued through August. On
August 4, six weeks before the Inchon landing, when the military
situation was still favorable to the invading North Korean forces
and the front was still deep in South Korea around the city of
Pusan, Mao, skeptical about North Korea’s capabilities, told the
Politburo: “If the American imperialists are victorious, they will
become dizzy with success, and then be in a position to threaten
us. We have to help Korea; we have to assist them. This can be in
the form of a volunteer force, and be at a time of our choosing,
but we must start to prepare.” 40 At the same meeting, Zhou made the same
basic analysis: “If the American imperialists crush North Korea,
they will be swollen with arrogance, and peace will be threatened.
If we want to assure victory, we must increase the China factor;
this may produce a change in the international situation. We must
take a long-range view.”41 In other words, it was the defeat of the
still advancing North Korea, not the particular location of
American forces, that China needed to resist. The next day, Mao
ordered his top commanders to “complete their preparations within
this month and be ready for orders to carry out war
operations.”42
On August 13, China’s
13th Army Corps held a conference of senior military leaders to
discuss this mission. Though expressing reservations about the
August deadline, the conference participants concluded that China
“should take the initiative, cooperate with the Korean People’s
Army, march forward without reluctance, and break up the enemy’s
dream of aggression.”43
In the meantime,
staff analysis and map exercises were taking place. They led the
Chinese to conclusions Westerners would have considered
counterintuitive, to the effect that China could win a war against
the American armed forces. American commitments around the world,
so the argument ran, would limit U.S. deployment to a maximum of
500,000, while China had an army of four million to draw on.
China’s proximity to the battlefield gave it a logistical
advantage. Chinese planners thought they would have a psychological
advantage too because most of the world’s people would support
China.44
Not even the
possibility of a nuclear strike daunted the Chinese
planners—probably because they had no firsthand experience with
nuclear weapons and no means of acquiring them. They concluded
(though not without some prominent dissenters) that an American
nuclear response was unlikely in the face of the Soviet nuclear
capacity, as well as the risk, due to the “jigsaw pattern” of
troops on the peninsula, that an American nuclear strike on Chinese
troops advancing into Korea might destroy U.S. forces as
well.45
On August 26, Zhou,
in a talk to the Central Military Commission, summed up the Chinese
strategy. Beijing should “not treat the Korean problem merely as
one of concerning a brother country or as one related to the
interests of the Northeast.” Instead Korea “should be regarded as
an important international issue.” Korea, Zhou argued, “is indeed
the focus of the struggles in the world. . . . After conquering
Korea, the United States will certainly turn to Vietnam and other
colonial countries. Therefore the Korean problem is at least the
key to the East.”46 Zhou concluded that due to recent North
Korean reversals, “Our duty is now much heavier . . . and we should
prepare for the worst and prepare quickly.” Zhou stressed the need
for secrecy, so that “we could enter the war and give the enemy a
sudden blow.”47
All of this was
taking place weeks before MacArthur’s amphibious landing at Inchon
(which a Chinese study group had predicted) and well over a month
before U.N. forces crossed the 38th parallel. In short, China
entered the war based on a carefully considered assessment of
strategic trends, not as a reaction to an American tactical
maneuver—nor out of a legalistic determination to defend the
sanctity of the 38th parallel. A Chinese offensive was a preemptive
strategy against dangers that had not yet materialized and based on
judgments about ultimate American purposes toward China that were
misapprehended. It was also an expression of the crucial role Korea
played in China’s long-range calculations—a condition perhaps even
more relevant in the contemporary world. Mao’s insistence on his
course was also probably influenced by a belief that it was the
only way to remedy his acquiescence in the Kim Il-sung and Stalin
strategy of invasion. Otherwise he might have been blamed by other
leaders for the worsening of China’s strategic situation by the
presence of the Seventh Fleet in the Taiwan Strait and of American
forces on China’s borders.
The obstacles to
Chinese intervention were so daunting that all of Mao’s leadership
was needed to achieve the approval of his colleagues. Two major
commanders, including Lin Biao, refused the command of the
Northeast Border Defense Army on various pretexts before Mao found
in Peng Dehuai a commander prepared to undertake the
assignment.
Mao prevailed, as he
had in all key decisions, and preparations for the entry of Chinese
forces into Korea went inexorably forward. October saw American and
allied forces moving toward the Yalu, determined to unify Korea and
to shelter it under a U.N. resolution. Their purpose was to defend
the new status quo with these forces, technically constituting a
U.N. command. The movement of the two armies toward each other thus
acquired a foreordained quality about it; the Chinese were
preparing a blow while the Americans and their allies remained
oblivious to the challenge waiting for them at the end of their
march north.
Zhou was careful to
set the diplomatic stage. On September 24 he protested to the
United Nations what he characterized as American efforts to “extend
the war of aggression against Korea, to carry out armed aggression
on Taiwan, and to extend further its aggression against
China.”48 On October 3, he warned the Indian
Ambassador K. M. Panikkar, that U.S. troops would cross the 38th
parallel and that “[i]f the U.S. troops really do so, we cannot sit
by idly and remain indifferent. We will intervene. Please report
this to the Prime Minister of your country.” 49 Panikkar replied
that he expected the crossing to occur within the next twelve
hours, but that the Indian government would “not be able to take
any effective action” until eighteen hours after the receipt of his
cable.50 Zhou responded: “That is the Americans’
business. The purpose of this evening’s talk is to let you know our
attitude toward one of the questions raised by Prime Minister Nehru
in his letter.”51 The talk was more making a record for what
was already decided than a last plea for peace, as it is so often
treated.
At that point, Stalin
reentered the scene as the deus ex machina for the continuation of
the conflict he had encouraged and which he did not want to see
ended. The North Korean army was collapsing, and another American
landing on the opposite coast was expected by Soviet intelligence
near Wonsan (wrongly). Chinese preparations for intervention were
far advanced but as yet not irrevocable. Stalin therefore decided,
in a message on October 1 to Mao, to demand Chinese intervention.
After Mao deferred a decision, citing the danger of American
intervention, Stalin sent a follow-up telegram. He was prepared, he
insisted, to pledge Soviet military support in an all-out war
should the United States react to Chinese intervention:
Of course, I took into account also [the possibility] that the USA, despite its unreadiness for a big war, could still be drawn into a big war out of [considerations of] prestige, which, in turn, would drag China into the war, and along with this draw into the war the USSR, which is bound with China by the Mutual Assistance Pact. Should we fear this? In my opinion, we should not, because together we will be stronger than the USA and England, while the other European capitalist states (with the exception of Germany which is unable to provide any assistance to the United States now) do not present serious military forces. If a war is inevitable, then let it be waged now, and not in a few years when Japanese militarism will be restored as an ally of the USA and when the USA and Japan will have a ready-made bridgehead on the continent in a form of the entire Korea run by Syngman Rhee.52
At its face value,
this extraordinary communication seemed to assert that Stalin was
ready to go to war with the United States to prevent Korea from
becoming part of America’s strategic sphere. A united, pro-American
Korea—to which, in Stalin’s eyes, sooner or later a resurgent Japan
would become a partner—presented, in that analysis, the same threat
in Asia as the emerging NATO in Europe. The two together might be
more than the Soviet Union could handle.
In the event, when
put to the test, Stalin proved unwilling to undertake the all-out
commitment he had pledged to Mao—or even any aspect of direct
confrontation with the United States. He knew that the balance of
power was too unfavorable for a showdown, much less a two-front
war. He sought to tie down the American military potential in Asia
and to involve China in enterprises that magnified its dependence
on Soviet support. What Stalin’s letter does demonstrate is how
seriously Soviet and Chinese strategists assessed the strategic
importance of Korea, if for quite different reasons.
Stalin’s letter
placed Mao in a predicament. It was one thing to plan intervention
in the abstract partly as an exercise in revolutionary solidarity.
It was another actually to carry it out, especially when the North
Korean army was on the verge of disintegrating. Chinese
intervention made imperative Soviet supplies and, above all, Soviet
air cover, since the PLA had no modern air force to speak of. Thus
when the issue of intervention was put before the Politburo, Mao
received an unusually ambivalent response, causing him to pause
before giving the final answer. Instead, Mao dispatched Lin Biao
(who had refused the command of the Chinese forces, citing health
problems) and Zhou to Russia to discuss the prospects of Soviet
assistance. Stalin was in the Caucasus on vacation but saw no
reason to alter his schedule. He obliged Zhou to come to his
retreat even though (or, perhaps, because) Zhou would have no means
of communication with Beijing from Stalin’s dacha except through
Soviet channels.
Zhou and Lin Biao had
been instructed to warn Stalin that, without assurances of
guaranteed supplies, China might not, in the end, carry out what it
had been preparing for two months. For China would be the principal
theater of the conflict Stalin was promoting. Its prospects would
depend on the supplies and direct support Stalin would make
available. When faced with this reality, Mao’s colleagues reacted
ambivalently. Some opponents even went so far as to argue that
priority should be given to domestic development. For once Mao
seemed to hesitate, if only for a moment. Was it a maneuver to
obtain a guarantee of support from Stalin before Chinese forces
were irrevocably committed? Or was he truly undecided?
A symptom of internal
Chinese divisions is the mysterious case of a telegram from Mao to
Stalin sent on the night of October 2, of which two contradictory
versions are held in the archives of Beijing and
Moscow.
In one version of
Mao’s telegram—drafted in Mao’s handwriting, filed in the archives
in Beijing, published in a neibu
(“internal circulation only”) Chinese collection of Mao’s
manuscripts, but likely never actually dispatched to Moscow—Mao
wrote that Beijing had “decided to send some of our troops to Korea
under the name of [Chinese People’s] Volunteers to fight the United
States and its lackey Syngman Rhee and to aid our Korean
comrades.”53 Mao cited the danger that absent Chinese
intervention, “the Korean revolutionary force will meet with a
fundamental defeat, and the American aggressors will rampage
unchecked once they occupy the whole of Korea. This will be
unfavorable to the entire East.”54 Mao noted that “we must be prepared for a
declaration of war by the United States and for the subsequent use
of the U.S. air force to bomb many of China’s main cities and
industrial bases, as well as an attack by the U.S. navy on [our]
coastal areas.” The Chinese plan was to send twelve divisions from
south Manchuria on October 15. “At the initial stage,” Mao wrote,
they would deploy north of the 38th parallel and “will merely
engage in defensive warfare” against enemy troops that cross the
parallel. In the meantime, “they will wait for the delivery of
Soviet weapons. Once they are [well] equipped, they will cooperate
with the Korean comrades in counterattacks to annihilate American
aggressor troops.”55
In a different
version of Mao’s October 2 telegram—sent via the Soviet ambassador
in Beijing, received in Moscow, and filed in the Russian
presidential archives—Mao informed Stalin that Beijing was
not prepared to send troops. He held
out the possibility that after further consultations with Moscow
(and, he implied, pledges of additional Soviet military support),
Beijing would be willing to join the conflict.
For years, scholars
analyzed the first version of the telegram as if it were the sole
operative version; when the second version emerged, some wondered
whether one of the documents might be a fabrication. Most plausible
is the explanation put forth by the Chinese scholar Shen Zhihua:
that Mao drafted the first version of the telegram intending to
send it, but that the Chinese leadership was so divided that a more
equivocal telegram was substituted. The discrepancy suggests that
even as Chinese troops advanced toward Korea, the Chinese
leadership was still debating about how long to hold out for a
definitive commitment of support from its Soviet ally before taking
the last irrevocable step.56
The two Communist
autocrats had been trained in a hard school of power politics,
which they were now applying to each other. In this case, Stalin
proved the quintessential hardball player. He coolly informed Mao
(via a joint telegram with Zhou) that, in view of China’s
hesitation, the best option would be to withdraw the remnants of
the North Korean forces into China, where Kim Il-sung could form a
provisional government-in-exile. The sick and disabled could go to
the Soviet Union. He did not mind Americans on his Asian border,
said Stalin, since he already faced them along the European
dividing lines.
Stalin knew that the
only outcome Mao wanted less than American forces at China’s
borders was a provisional Korean government in Manchuria in contact
with the Korean minority living there, claiming some kind of
sovereignty and constantly pressing military adventures into Korea.
And he must have sensed that Mao had passed the point of no return.
China’s choice, at this point, was between an American army on the
Yalu, directly threatening the half of Chinese industry within easy
reach, and a disgruntled Soviet Union, holding back on supplies,
perhaps reinvoking its “rights” in Manchuria. Or else China would
proceed along the course Mao had continued to pursue even while
bargaining with Stalin. He was in a position where he had to
intervene, paradoxically in part to protect himself against Soviet
designs.
On October 19, after
several days of delay to await a guarantee of Soviet supplies, Mao
ordered the army to cross into Korea. Stalin pledged substantial
logistical support, provided only that it involved no direct
confrontation with the United States (for example, air cover over
Manchuria but not over Korea).
Mutual suspicion was
so rampant that Zhou had no sooner returned to Moscow, from where
he could communicate with Beijing, than Stalin seemingly reversed
himself. To prevent Mao from maneuvering the Soviet Union into
bearing the brunt of equipping the PLA without getting the benefit
of its tying down American forces in combat in Korea, Stalin
informed Zhou that no supplies would start moving until Chinese
forces had, in fact, entered Korea. Mao issued the order on October
19, in effect without an assurance of Soviet support. After that,
the originally promised Soviet support was reinstated, though the
ever cautious Stalin confined Soviet air support to Chinese
territory. So much for the readiness expressed in his earlier
letter to Mao to risk a general war over Korea.
Both Communist
leaders had exploited each other’s necessities and insecurities.
Mao had succeeded in obtaining Soviet military supplies to
modernize his army—some Chinese sources claim that during the
Korean War he received equipment for sixty-four infantry divisions
and twenty-two air divisions57—and Stalin had tied down China into a
conflict with the United States in Korea.