5. Time the Tiger
I
It was, as usual in
London about that time of the year, endeavouring to snow. There had
been a hard frost for days, in fact it was so cold that in any
other country it would have snowed long ago. The sky was a
constipated mass, yellowed by the fog, suspended over a city
awaiting the Deluge. It was eight-thirty in the morning. The
streets of Rotting Hill were like Pompeii with Vesuvius in
catastrophic eruption, a dull glare, saffronish in colour,
providing an unearthly uniformity. The self-centred precipitancy of
the bowed pedestrians resembled a procession of fugitives.
Mark Robins was
standing at his bathroom window. His eye followed with displeasure
the absurdly ominous figures moving under mass-pressure to be there
at nine o’clock, passing on through the hollow twilit streets
towards the swarming undergrounds. It was the urgency that jarred,
their will-to-live as a machine.
He could see into
the lighted baker’s shop. The lady known in his private mind as
“bum-face” arranged yesterday’s and of course the day before
yesterday’s pastry in the window. Whenever he saw the old pastries
ranged in the window he thought of that air of uprightness and
invincible integrity owned by the little master-baker. Why were his
loaves the least white, the greyest, of any in Rotting Hill? He
held very strong opinions on the subject of the socialist
administration: perhaps cause and effect. His bread became as hard
as a brick within forty-eight hours. It became like that in the
stomach too if you failed to expel it promptly. This baker’s views
on the socialist government were as forcible as a pick-pocket’s are
regarding the police force, only the baker’s had the added force of
moral indignation.
Then, as Mark idly
watched, “Fringe” (in his private mind she was known as that) erect
and white in her chemist’s uniform, came out of Willough’s. She
moved like clockwork, as steady as the swan on the surface of the
lake. Whenever she turned she turned abruptly at right-angles with
the precision of a Royal Marine. She had been a she-soldier. Mark
approved of “Fringe”, and regretfully noted how she stopped,
pivoted to face at right-angles, and entered the baker’s shop (as
she did every morning) and selected an ageing pastry. However, she
worked in a chemist’s and no doubt kept her bowels open.
In several windows
of the lofty Victorian houses—all Private Hotels—where the diligent
refugees of Rotting Hill were already at work on their biographies
of Goethe or of Meyerbeer, there was electric light. The
silversmith and diamond merchant was (typical of his class! thought
Mark) the latest riser of the tradesmen of Rotting Hill. The last
snores of the night blew out of his nostrils upon the little
fluttery moustache as his head lay on the pillow beside that of
Mrs. Silversmith. Both the Silversmiths and Mark had a low opinion
of the other’s morale: their flats so situated that nothing that
went on in one was exactly a closed book for the other—especially
in view of the prohibitive cost of material for curtains and the
veils that in happier times shroud our domestic interiors.
Mark withdrew from
the window. He sighed. He did not know why he sighed. But a large
white “Ascot heater” stood in a corner of the bathroom which no
longer produced hot water. Three months earlier the mechanic of the
gas service had called for the routine clean-up. Since then it had
been out of action. Mark boiled some water in the kitchen and
washed: then he filled the kettle again, and again put it on to
boil. After that he went to his guest’s room, knocked at the door,
and put his head inside.
“Charles! Stop
dreaming and get up. I have put some water on to boil for
you.”
“Thank you, Mark.
Whooah!” Charles yawned.
“You slept
well?”
“Perfectly.”
“Good.”
“Whooah.”
As he went to his
room Mark was smiling. “Whooah!” was so like Charles. Seeing
Charles in bed “whooahing” had caused him for some reason to think
of Ida Dyat, Charles’s sister. He thought of her, as he always did,
in repose. Action was not her element: so, though on horseback her
hair was dramatic as a maenad’s, he preferred to think of the
stationary cloud of dull gold as she lay back in an armchair
reading a book. The indolent red lips he would see for preference
at their most indolent, when she had been too lazy to smile and had
smiled with her eyes instead—which was less trouble. Her beauty was
preraphaelite at its best, brooding or dreaming in some equivalent
of the mirror of the Lady of Shalott.
It was a certain
inactivity in Ida’s composition which attracted him most, and it
was that, too, that accounted for his romantic attachment remaining
in a state of abortive repression, contained within the forms of
youthful camaraderie: Mark being one of those men who needed, if
not to be hunted by the female, at least to be reminded that women
are sexual phenomena. But always a warm wind from the past rushed
into his mind when he had, as now, these images
of her. Then the
image suddenly dissolved, his smile faded. For Ida must be a hag of
forty-five, he thought. Thinking of Ida as greying and pathetic was
so immensely distasteful that he began moving quickly and noisily
about. Old Charles stopped young though, he thought. “Whooah.” Mark
smiled again.
But he soon forgot
Charles’s sea-lion cry, for he became grimly absorbed in dressing.
His bedroom was a far more efficient refrigerator than the “Ascot
heater” was a heater. However, the Briton regards chilliness as
next to godliness. Mark would have been quite as displeased had the
refrigerator failed as he had been at the defection of the
“heater”.
Taking a fresh shirt
out of the drawer he identified it—as the one with the smallest
buttonholes of any. This abnormality was revealed by all new shirts
to some degree. With the shirt in question the buttons refused to
go in. Each buttonhole had to be forcibly entered, the one at the
top entailing as much sometimes as five minutes strenuous thumbing.
Unquestionably this afforded him that grim satisfaction the Briton
experiences when senseless obstacles are placed in his way or life
bristles with purposeful mischance, all food for his “grit”. But in
this case there was another factor: namely the credit and good name
of a socialist Britain. Probably it would prove a better
advertisement if British manufacturers turned out serviceable
shirts—easy to button up and with such conveniences as are prized
by self-indulgent foreigners. It was like our taxation. Few
foreigners understood that. Taxes such
as we can stand up to would cause a
revolution anywhere else. Only we have
the guts to “take it”. Besides, the obvious explanation of the
smallness of these buttonholes aroused Mark’s party-zeal: the
motive was profit. It saved labour and
time in the factory to make them small. It was a relief to one’s
feelings to reflect that the days were numbered of “free
enterprise” shirt manufacture.
Even the best shirts
tended to shrink and the buttonholes lost width in the wash quite
as much as the sleeves lost length, if only a little. But the
button naturally was unaffected. Any slight dilation of the
buttonholes attendant upon the constant passage, in and out, of the
button, was less than its shrinkage in the wash. It had of course occurred to Mark to purchase a few
dozen shirt buttons, smaller than those on the shirt. But although
there were many sorts of buttons in the shops, shirt-buttons (oddly
enough) were practically unobtainable.
As he pulled on a
sock one of his fingernails caught in the wool. With an almost new
pair of nail-scissors he attempted to cut off the chipped nail. But
the scissors were already loose and of a metal formerly unknown to
cutlery. The nail was bent by them, it was not severed. He fell
back on his nail-file. After a little he gave that up, and stuck a
band-aid over the nail.
The quality of all
goods supplied by the sundriesmen had inevitably deteriorated. Then
he knew about the small piratic factories that turned out the
defective steel goods, inundating England with gimcrack
merchandise, and felt grateful that their days were numbered in a
collectivist society.
Mark was
superstitious. To start the day in slippers appeared to him almost
an ill-omen. The shoes on which his choice fell, on this occasion,
were his recently-acquired £5 brown pair. Of these he was still
rather proud—an emotion the shoes were not fitted to inspire. And
Charles had assured him that there was no pair of shoes to be had
worth putting on your feet under seven pounds ten.
With these shoes he
invariably attempted, completely without success, to tie a bow. The
shoelaces were too short. In England today the statutory length for
shoelaces is fourteen inches. It is illegal to supply laces longer
than that. Mark was not aware that he had to thank the Government
for this idiotic difficulty, and put it down to some dishonest
manufacturer selling short weight on the plea of a non-existent
“shortage”. As usual, for all his stout finger-work, he got nothing
but a solitary loop, one for the left foot, one for the
right.
He rose to his feet,
the petty frustrations involved in the act of dressing done with. A
tweed jacket hung from a peg. No peasant weaver could ever have
been responsible for the vulgarity of the colour. Mark, who had
paid twenty pounds for it, eyed it dubiously. It was about the
maximum price for a ready-made tweed. All first-quality tweeds, of
course, must be reserved for export. But why (the question had once forced its way into
Mark’s mind) need what was left for the home-market be so ugly and
vulgar?
Another question:
Why should all ready-made jackets, cardigans, jumpers, be made for
small and frail men? Mark was tall and muscular, so that question it would have been inhuman to ignore.
But it was easily answered, too. Far less material was required for
a small man or a child than for someone of Mark’s size.
Consequently the manufacturers preferred to think that Englishmen,
with a few exceptions, are stunted and emaciated.
Mark took the jacket
off the hanger and a phoney smell of ersatz peat assailed his
nostrils. It was with no possessive glow he put on this practically
new garment and as he left the bedroom he registered depression. He
could not guess why sans amour et sans
haine his heart was so full of a low-grade pain.
There was no sound
of Charles, so he went into the kitchen to prepare the breakfast.
He took the “Strachey loaf”, as Charles cheaply called it, out of
the bread tin. Officially it was one day old, but when he applied
the bread-saw it was like sawing brick. He sawed off four slices
and grilled them two at a time. The kettle had been refilled and
was acquiring a little heat. He threw the remainder of his
butter-ration into the repast, added a few pinches of alleged
Darjeeling to the pseudo-Ceylon in the teapot: placed on the tray
the two dishes of cereal, a teaspoonful of sugar for each. Sugar
was always a bad shortage with him. He took down a jar marked
“Strawberry Jam”, recognized by housewives as mainly pectin and/or
carrot pulp, given appropriate local colour of course and flavour
to match. There was neither nourishment nor pleasure to be had from
it. Charles appeared, yawning and smiling.
“Why no Mrs.
Bristers?” he enquired.
“Oh, she does not come when I have ’flu.”
“Why?”
“Because—I
believe this is the reason—Mrs.
Bristers thinks I am putting it on. Swinging the lead.”
“When you quit
malingering she comes back.”
“Yes. Of course she
malingers herself meanwhile. She calls off her malinger as soon as
I announce my recovery.”
“Anything I can do,”
Charles said, “in Mrs. Bristers’ absence?”
He was given the
kettle to carry.
“How do you feel
this morning?” The guest put the question.
Mark hesitated a
moment. “Depressed!” he confided. “Unaccountably depressed.”
II
They both moved into
the living-room, the lightly laden Charles in the van.
“What a poisonous
day,” Charles shouted, and the room was in fact so dark that when a
match was struck to light the gas-fire it was like a miniature
firework display.
“A bit of fog,” Mark
conceded with didactic firmness.
Where the weather
was concerned Mark was always on the defensive, because people were
apt to blame the Government for the weather. Then, he had a feeling
that very bad weather (of which there was an awful lot)
was, in fact, compromising in a brave
new day.
They sat down facing
one another and Mark poured out the tea.
“Ah, that is a
capital idea.” Charles picked up a piece of toast and examined it.
“The dreadful bread arrives disguised as good old-fashioned
toast.”
“Let’s see, you like
sugar?” Mark looked up, a cube poised above the cup.
“If you think it
won’t spoil the tea!”
Mark laughed. Even a
bureaucrat laughs sometimes on such occasions, as a clergyman would
consider it politic to laugh at not too
coarse an anecdote. Besides, he was fond of tea. “It is certainly
not good tea,” he said in a firm voice. “I have tried to coax some
decent tea out of my grocer. But I really believe he had
none.”
“Have you tipped
him?”
“Good gracious no!”
Mark protested.
Charles shook his
head, dogmatically flourishing a piece of toast. “I am afraid you
cannot expect to get anything if you don’t oil their palms.”
Mark’s was a damp
smile.
“Do you,” he
enquired, “go around oiling everyone’s palm? I know that is done.
But it does not strike me as very nice. You may get the lion’s
share that way but it is the behaviour of a less noble animal. I
will not say a rat.”
“A pig, you think,
eh!” Charles laughed, drinking with relish. “Best to drink this
stuff while it is so hot you can’t
taste it.”
Since Mark had
worked at the Ministry of Education and since Charles had become a
farmer of a rather lurid black-market type, they had started
arguing differently. In their discussions in the old days nothing
more concrete or subjective, as a rule, was touched on than the
present Catholic revival or the currency of the Incas. Also when,
in easy-going debate, Charles’s opinion prevailed, Mark did not
mind in the least. Today, however, he would defend his position, at
times, almost acrimoniously, particularly where the issue was
political. This was very unMark like.
Mark Robins and
Charles Dyat had known one another as schoolboys, been at
Marlborough, then at Oxford together. Neither had formed any close
friendship except this one of theirs. But its rationale was not
likemindedness. Charles was what is labelled “a leader-type”. Mark
had little taste for responsibility. These two facts alone may have
provided the essential ingredients for a friendship.
Theirs was not quite
the comic marriage-of-opposites, instances of which are so common.
Leaving aside physical contrast—Charles who was fair, being only of
middling height and Mark being a tall black-haired man—Charles
looked at life from a certain social eminence (an imaginary one),
whereas Mark was uninterested in social distinctions. Where
intellectual distinctions are concerned he was rather romantic,
from which circumstance Charles had benefited. Charles he
considered very brilliant, unquestionably destined for great
things. Again, were one to investigate and collate, their roots
would reveal a common soil exploited to different ends. Both came
from the prosperous professional middle class: but Charles’s father
had been a successful and a pretentious country lawyer, who ran at
one time a butler and footman, his large house, Tadicombe Priory,
standing in half a dozen acres of pseudo-park, a small satellite
farm completing the picture: Mark’s father, on the other hand, was
a Manchester doctor with a big practice, with neither time nor
inclination to emulate his most snooty patients.
So the conversation
had taken the acrimonious turn it nowadays was always liable to do.
Mark ate his handful of cereal, inadequately sweetened with the
teaspoonful of sugar (although the Jamaicans were starving because
nobody wanted their sugar-cane). Charles noisily tested the
friability of a blackened and gritty crust, smeared with ersatz
jam. Then Charles sat back, and after a minute or two took up again
the question of tipping.
“Of course I go
around oiling palms,” he began aggressively. “Your masters don’t
need to—they have their farms like Stalin’s commissars and their
privileges. But you and I have to exude pourboires or our health
would suffer. You can’t live on one ration book without tipping.
Tipping is the black market of the poor.”
Mark no longer
hesitated to recognize the political gulf which yawned and gaped
between them. Charles smiled his tough gay smile, belonging to his
cavalier complex, as he glanced into the yawning chasm. The white
hairs in his brushed-off-the-mouth moustache were not numerous
enough to make it “gray”, the gold-gray of the temples he kept
clipped. In the yellow gloom he sat up, eyes dancing, a gallant
little daguerreotype darkened by the fog of time. Mark returned his
gaze, with a bit of a waver, across the grim period-piece of
sham-tea, sham-jam, “processed” butter, grey bread scorched into
toast. He admired, as he had always done, the lawless eye, the
witty mouth.
Charles was too
monotonously destructive, however: he had an individualist itch to pick holes, in Mark’s phrase.
Where Mark would be apt to respect the most pernicious by-law,
Charles would be quite certain to break it. Was he not (in
imagination) of the class that made the laws? As part of his
synthetic “aristocratic” outfit he despised all laws and the
law-abiding. But the great social changes since 1945 of necessity
complicated the role of the synthetic “aristocrat”. Charles was
towered over by a hostile Zeitgeist. Mark saw quite well this
menacing shadow looming over his friend as he argued: for the
natural lawgiver had become a potential outlaw.
“In our young days,
Mark,” Charles said softly, “it was you, you know, who were the little Tory, I the
little radical. Do you remember?”
Mark agreed that he
had been a dreadful reactionary and that Charles had been most
frightfully advanced. “A perfect devil, in fact!” he laughed a
little derisively.
Charles pushed his
cup towards the teapot. “May I have some more of that bloody tea?
Yes, you were quite shocked at my red tie.”
“I was!”
Flushed and
animated, Charles had laid aside his imperious technique—he had
chosen to soothe and to charm. For the second time that morning
Charles forcibly recalled his sister—the submerged sexual asset in
this friendship was brought into play. Mark softened at once in
response: and it was with eyes still moist that he looked up and
cooperated in recalling the pleasurable absurdities of
undergraduate youth. “You did really alarm me at one time,” he
confessed. “We nearly parted company for ever on the subject of
Trotsky, for whom you had a most irrational admiration. Do you, I
wonder, retain any vestige of that obsession?”
“He would be better
than this lot!” Charles answered. He emptied his cup. “For what we
have received by gracious permission of the Ministry of Food may
the Lord make us truly thankful.”
“Amen,” said Mark.
Charles lighted a cigarette, then rather abruptly he
announced:
“No, I am no Tory. I
am just a defeatist.”
Frown lines returned
to Mark’s forehead, he bent a questioning eye upon the peccant
Charles.
“You should not be
that,” he said.
“Why not?” Charles
asked, with amiable truculence. “We are not going to win the Peace
on monkey-nuts and black bread, whether as socialists or
Churchillites. I suppose I am, after all, not defeatist. I don’t want England to degenerate
into a slum, presided over by a sanctimonious official class. If I
despaired as you do and sold out to Beelzebub, then I should
complain no more of course—I should say yes to bad tea, to bad bread, to the purchase-tax,
to the income tax, to no petrol, to three-and-sixpence for
cigarettes, and to a doctrine of servile submission.”
“If you think it is
the way to win the Peace, Charles—to use your ridiculous
expression—to find fault…?”
But Charles broke in
impatiently.
“Of course one must
find fault, Mark. You work for them, that is another matter. But
why on earth should I swallow their
rotten tea, and smoke their extortionately-priced cigarettes (two
shillings and tuppence of the three-and-sixpence goes to the
Government) and say it is heaven? Besides, mankind cannot dispense
with fault finding, or call it by its proper name, criticism. If an
inventor were enraptured with every model he produced, even his
first rough draught, if he dispensed with the principle of trial
and error—if he tested but never
discarded—he would not get very far.”
“Nor would he if he
listened to every ignorant suggestion.”
“The trouble is that
all the experts are outside, not inside, the Government and its
committees.”
“Quite untrue, but
go on.”
“These people are
not trying, however, that is my main
complaint. They have in mind something quite different from a
prosperous society. They have in mind an abject society. When you
and I yearn for good tea and for white bread, that is
‘reactionary’.”
“Which is utter
nonsense, Charles. There is a world
food crisis. I am sorry, but there is.”
“Do you really
believe that? Are you incapable of using your reason, have they
deprived you of that, my poor Mark?”
“No. It is not I who
am irrational…”
Charles gathered
himself for an assault upon the citadel of Unreason, and Mark,
smiling nervously, manned the walls.
“I am as sure as
that I am sitting in this chair—it seems to me self-evident, that
the most irksome of the restrictions and shortages are not economic
but ideologic; political. A Government which wanted to create an
atmosphere differing from that of a Poor House, which is what we
experience, could do so without risk of any kind to its economic
stability. Why is there no rationing in Switzerland, a country
which imports proportionately just as much food as we do? Why are
things more ‘normal’ in France, Italy, Belgium, Holland? The answer
is that our rulers do not wish for a return to normality. They
desire to maintain abnormality and ‘crisis’. Even in Western
Germany there is much more food than here.”
They had both pushed
their chairs back a little from the table, the glow from their
cigarettes sometimes lit up their faces in the yellow gloom, which
the electric light did not banish.
“Is it really
necessary for me to point out why England appears worse off than
neighbouring countries?” Mark asked testily. “It is easy enough to
explain, and it is very much to her credit that she does so
appear.”
“Oh, yeees?”
“Yes. In other west
European countries Marshall Aid has reached the top crust only, the
idea being that it would somehow, some of it, trickle down to the
bottom. A return to normal luxury was
in that way rapidly achieved. You mentioned Western Germany. The
most dreadful contrasts exist there—of a new Schiebertum in stark contrast with an indescribable
poverty. They have just fixed prices so high that only the rich can
buy the best food—and then they abandon rationing! So could we
easily if we were so inhumane as to adopt that method! In England
rationing stopped the well-off from getting all the food. It is a
façade of immoral luxury in Paris that makes the French seem
‘better off’ than the English to the tourist. Underneath the gilded
crust those countries are worse off.
You ought to know better than to believe…”
“So ought you, so
ought you!” Charles yelled delightedly, waving his hands. “Don’t
you believe all that stuff about a thin gilded top crust, with
famine underneath. In Paris restaurants frequented by taxi-drivers
you feed better than at the Savoy. Anywhere in France one can eat far better, far
more, and far cheaper, than here in England. And there is no filthy purchase-tax either. You
forgot to mention that!”
“Really old
chap…!”
“Be patient. We
English are in the presence of a Great Design. The big idea is to
push this people down to a living-plane strictly that of the
average manual worker. That is the first phase. When they have us
tied up with controls so that we cannot move hand or foot and have
drugged us with dogmas, the idea is to push the entire mass down
lower yet, to a carefully regulated peonage, paid possibly with
scrip, all shops state-owned. Nothing must stick up above the
primitive level decreed except the Party. Even such tiny
protuberances as us, Mark, with our hankering after good tea (of
the old middle-class days) are an offence. The ‘crisis’ atmosphere
is of the same kind as the wartime black-out. All are now agreed
that the black-out was grossly overdone in England if not totally
pointless. It was ‘atmosphere’. This tasteless tea is atmosphere. So is that ghastly bread!”
Mark had been
listening more attentively at last, but his expression became much
more severe. He examined his friend—the eloquent moustachioed
mouth, the eager ideologic eye, the inflexion of the “county”: he
watched as if engaged in making a diagnosis, with a patient who
revealed symptoms more and more disquieting. As Charles stopped his
host suddenly stood up.
“Charles, you are
hopeless,” Mark told him quietly—in a tone in which a doctor would
wind up, “and I fear it is malignant.”
“Incurable. I am
chronically sick of the present Government.”
“Where on earth did
you collect all those batty beliefs? A Great Design! Socialists are
sparing you, Charles, the exquisite inconveniences of a bloody
revolution.”
“Fiddlesticks. Like
Kerensky they are paving the way for communism.”
Mark shook his
head.
“You get your
politics from the Daily Express.” He
stretched. “I am going to get my mail.”
“Postman doesn’t
bring it up any more—pops it in a box downstairs—have to fetch it
yourself—serve you right!” Charles chanted, lying back, his face to
the ceiling and puffing derisive smoke through his moustache.
Mark stopped at the
door. “Egotist! Why should that poor devil climb fifty flights of
flat-stairs every morning and get varicose veins and fallen
arches!”
“He did before!”
Charles called after him. “And—he’s varicosed already. His feet are
as flat as a pancake!”
Mark roared back
from the stair-head. “You will be a postman yourself in your next
incarnation.”
“Not going to have
any more lives,” howled Charles. “This life is quite enough for
me!”
When Mark got back,
muttering “excuse me” he tore open a buff envelope, glanced at the
contents and hastened to the telephone. He dialled a number and
waited. With an irritable sigh he hung up and redialled. After a
minute or so he rehung and dialled a single number.
Charles laughed.
“Telephone not working this morning? The Exchange will see what
they can do! Dial O.”
“Will you try and
get me Whitehall 6688?… Yes, I have dialled twice. There was
absolutely no sound… Thank you.” (A long pause.) “Number engaged?
But there are twenty lines at least… Thank you.” (A long pause.)
“What?… The number is Whitehall 6688 not Whitechapel 8866… No, it
is not 8866… All right.”
During this pause
Charles chattered. “It keeps a lot of people out of mischief
playing telephones. An American woman wrote to my paper the other
day that it took longer to get through to Brighton than to Buffalo,
New York.”
Mark was speaking at
the telephone. “Yes. I am having a blood test at twelve o’clock…
No, they think it is all right… I will. I will mail it
tonight.”
Mark looked at his
watch, quickly dialled again. Then he exploded.
“Are you Temple Bar
5032 or not!… Oh, 8976. I see. Sorry.”
He rehung and dialled again. A short pause.
“What is your
number?… Not 8976 again!… Oh damn.
Sorry.”
Mark rehung and
dialled a single number.
“The symbolical
number Zero!” observed Charles as he went to the door. “You are
showing the Dunkirk spirit, stout fellow. You haven’t left your
post at the telephone. You have to vacate all numbers except Zero.
So you go and live with good old Zero. Why not always dial O? Why
have any truck with anything but Zero?”
Ten minutes later
Mark was setting off, a brown paper parcel held against the
stomach. Charles joined him.
“Going to be bled?”
said he.
“If you care to call
it that.”
“Just what you need
as a matter of fact, bleeding.”
“You think so,
Charles?”
“What we all have to
put up with, you deny the existence of.
You bottle up the curses to which I
give vent! You suppress more than I
spit out. One of these fine days at that rotten old telephone you
will explode, the bad blood you bottle up will tear you
apart—bang!”
Mark laughed. “You
have got it all wrong! The telephone staff are…”
“Wonderful—I know, I
know, all ought to have a Victoria Cross and a Nobel Prize. And so
ought you—so ought you! Come along and be bled—quick.”
Outside the
flat-door before pulling it shut, Mark stood still and fixed an
Ancient Mariner-like eye upon Charles.
“Let me tell you
something, Charlie!”
“Yes?”
“All the intelligent
people I know—intelligent, Charles,
intelligent—are socialists. They have discovered suddenly that they
are socialists.”
“You mean all the
smart alecks.”
“Oh no. For it is
stupid, Charles, to be a little
black-marketeer. Not very intelligent, Charles!” And Mark poked
Charles with a stiff forefinger.
“And, Mark, my lad!”
Charles poked an expressive forefinger into Mark’s midriff. “The
winning side, eh! Cowardy cowardy custard!”
Mark growled with
sporting glee and his eyes sparkled as he flattened the tip of his
square-headed forefinger upon Charles’s chest. “Not so, Robin Hood!
Not so Dick Turpin! You will end with a price on your head!”
“Ha! And
your head”—and Charles flattened his
forefinger upon Mark’s cheekbone—“won’t fetch a farthing if it ever
comes up in a witches’ auction. This yes-man’s
skull one farding! No bids.”
“I suppose, Charlot,
you pat yourself on the back,” and Mark flattened his forefingertip
on Charles’s arm. “You outwit the police, yes? Rich Americans get
their black-market eggs, illegal rashers, and what not, thanks to
good little Charlie! Fine intelligent work, what!”
“And you, my smart
man,” Charles poked him pointedly with his finger, “you have one
egg a week and crow as though the millennium were here!”
And they went
shouting down the stairs, jabbing each other mirthfully with their
forefingers.
III
During the remainder
of that day the two friends might be found in various parts of the
town, up to 11 p.m. when they returned to Rotting Hill. Their cab
took them up Wimpole Street on the way to the Heppel Laboratories.
As they ascended one of the two celebrated streets of costly
medicine-men Charles reacted characteristically to his
surroundings. “The art of medicine,” he said, “will decay in this
country. The National Health Act writes finis to fine work in surgery and dentistry, and
doctors will sink to the status of druggists—with more
responsibility and less pay.” To which Mark replied,
“Charles—rubbish! When medicine ceases to be a profitable racket as
it is at present it will be far better placed to make real
advances. They may even discover a cure for the common cold.”
The man with the
dirty white clinical-coat who let them in said: “I suppose it’s for
a blood-draw?” “I imagine so,” said Charles. “My friend is badly in
need of a letting.” The man himself
looked like a blood-donor in the last stages of pernicious anaemia,
but he was a hectically talkative Cockney.
When Mark’s turn
came to go in to be “drawn” he expected to find himself in a
laboratory, spectacularly antiseptic, white jars and tubes
containing human blood, labelled and ready for diagnosis, lined up
on glass shelves. The tools for “the draw” would be much in
evidence. But this was a Socialist dream. What actually happened
was so much the reverse that Mark supposed a preliminary interview
was considered necessary.
A dingy sitting-room
of the Trollope period was where he found himself. No vacuum
cleaner ever came near the dusty shelves and decrepit leather
arm-chairs. The doctor would have been all the better for a little
mechanical suction too. But he was unmistakably a doctor: he
invited Mark, with great urbanity and kindness, to take off his
jacket and to be seated near him beside an untidy desk: and when
they were both smilingly seated close together by the desk he
invited Mark to roll up a sleeve. This was it, then!
The doctor, still
smiling, examined Mark’s left and right arms, well stocked with
muscles and fat. “I think we will take it from the finger,” he
announced with quiet affability—he could not have spoken more
softly or smiled with better breeding. “Your hands are very cold,”
the doctor remarked sympathetically. And indeed, the room was so
cold that Mark’s hands were like ice rather than flesh. The doctor
was evidently used to this complication. He led his case to a
wash-basin. There the hands were practically boiled, and they both
went back to the chairs again. The doctor smiled with exquisite
courtesy and kindness. “Warmer now!” he said. “Yes. The
hands are,” said Mark. The doctor
apologetically took his right hand and gently stroked the middle
finger with a piece of wet cotton wool. Then rather unexpectedly he
jabbed an instrument deep into the ball of the fingertip.
The doctor drew out
the instrument and proceeded to squeeze the hole he had made quite
viciously. He murmured a complaint about the paucity of blood, then
jabbed his instrument in again. “Sorry!” he murmured (he was a very
perfect gentleman) and started squeezing again and collecting the
red trickle.
“My blood,” said
Mark, “refuses to visit so exposed an outpost of my body. It lurks
in the well-covered trunk until I get into a warmer room. Then it
may come out.”
The doctor smiled
gently and indulgently as he fixed on the band-aid and said “I am
so sorry the room is not warmer. When we throw out this Government,
Mr. Robins…!” Mark looked at him severely as he put his jacket on
and very coldly observed: “It is not the Government that is to
blame, sir, as you know quite well! Good day.” As they were being
shown out by the hysterical anaemic Cockney with the dirty white
coat, Mark enquired, “Is this a National Health Service place?” to
which the answer came with a laugh. “No, sir… not by a long shot.
We do have National Health Service
patients, sir, when the other laboratories are flooded out as I
might say with them. Let me see, yes, sir, there was one of them
this morning, sir.” Charles burst into a laugh which caused the
doorman to jump almost out of his dirty white coat.
“I,” said Mark
sternly, “am that National Health Service patient. I shall
immediately report the filthy condition of this place, and the
lamentable disregard of sepsis. Why do you not send that coat to
the wash? Good morning!”
Charles remained on
the doorstep holding his sides, which a gargantuan laugh threatened
to split. He stamped about gasping for breath.
“You are growing
into an idiot!” said Mark.
“But I would not
have missed that for anything. ‘Why don’t you send it to the wash?’
Ha, ha! Sublime! The Welfare State in action. An informer!” And he
pointed at his friend a trembling finger. “Snooper!”
“Shut up.” Mark
walked smartly away.
But Mark had not
lost Charles. As he entered the marble halls of the Richelieu near
Piccadilly, Charles was at his side—or he was at Charles’s. This
most famous establishment has always specialized in poor food. But
the grill room lunch was a carefully calculated insult to the
British palate, delivered by a staff of deaf but noisy Italians,
who flung the plates down on the table, and rushed away, deaf to
the protests which at once arose. The “soupe brésilienne” was dirty
yellow water, the “foie braisée mode de Mayence” was literally a
piece of blackened shoe-leather, the “pommes soufflées Richelieu”
had never “blown” and tasted of last month’s fats, and the “baba au
rhum” had no rum and was not a baba. The coffee tasted so rancid
and bitter that one sip was more than enough.
“If you put a five
shilling ceiling on what may be charged for a meal…” said Charles
in answer to Mark’s muttered apology, lighting a cigarette. “A man
has to live.”
“He does not have to
live at the expense of the community. This is bad behaviour!”
“Report ’em!”
Charles winked at him.
Mark eyed the wine
list with distaste. “What will you have, Charles?” They had a
double “Fine Maison” and Mark spoke of Ida. “I was thinking the
other day,” he said, “we haven’t met since…when was it? Being out of England most of the war years
in the East damages one’s time-sense, deflates the perspectives or
something.”
“It was 1936 I
believe, down at Tadpole’s.”
“So it was, so it
was!”
“As a matter of
fact,” Charles told him, “she is coming down to stay with me and is
coming to London tomorrow.”
“Is she really—you
didn’t tell me, Charles…”
A mixed expression
came into Mark’s face, which he struggled to conceal. It was the
outcome of inharmonious emotions. In his effort to shut off the
true expression he acquired one of sheepish benevolence. “How is
old Ida now?” he asked, frowning in sympathetic puzzlement, as if
he had asked a pretty difficult question. “I have often meant to
get you to tell me how she spends her time. You don’t see much of
her, do you, but I haven’t seen her for over ten years. I was
awfully sorry to have missed her last year. That was your fault!
Has she altered…I mean become a blue-stocking or anything?”
Charles smiled
enigmatically. “Come along with me tomorrow to her club; she would
like most awfully to see you, I know.”
“May I, Charles? An
excellent idea, I still have a day or two’s sick leave. It will be
most exciting seeing Ida again. Another snort? I’m going to.
Waiter!”
A half-hour later
the two friends stood in one of London’s largest stores, the brown
paper parcel still held by Mark rather carefully, against his
left-hand breast pocket. The thick and sluggish stream of
shop-gazing charladies, finding an obstruction, bumped it and
rolled around it. For Mark and Charles stood together muttering in
the middle of the MEN’S SHIRTS. They examined attentively a batch
of shirts of most attractive soft check, conspicuously
displayed.
“Sixty shillings,”
said Charles pleasantly, “of which fifty per cent, I expect, is
purchase-tax. You bought two. So you paid Cripps sixty shillings
when you fell for this pretty checkwork.”
“Try not to talk
like the Daily Express,” Mark
observed.
“Oh, well, you love
Cripps so much you probably feel patriotic about it.”
Mark asked a tall
shopman where the manager of the department was to be found.
“I am the assistant
manager,” he was politely informed. “The manager is away.”
A young man came up
to him with a bill which he initialled or something. Mark opened
his parcel and revealed a shirt identical in all respects with the
attractive pale blue checks displayed on the counter. The assistant
manager gazed at the shirt and then looked enquiringly at
Mark.
“Have you had any
complaints about these shirts?” Mark asked him.
“No, sir. None
whatever.”